Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label 1984. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1984. Show all posts

Saturday, January 25, 2014

I Know What You're Up To!


I awoke this morning completely unsure of anything. This, in and of itself, is not remarkable, but this time my suspicions centered on this brave new 1984 world and how it’s very possibly playing me for the fool I like to think I’m not, (but very well may be, if I’m correct, which actually, if I am, really makes me less of a fool, so you can see why I’m feeling a bit unsure).

You see, I’ve been starting to wonder if the “old friends” I’ve been in contact with through this so-called boon to man—(and gabby women especially)—called Facebook are really who they’re purporting to be. It suddenly occurred to me—in the shower, in fact, as these things are wont to do—that the people who have claimed their connections to me—and have been gingerly sending their familiar communications into my message hole—may very well not be the people they say they are.

How the hell am I supposed to know for sure?! Certainly, it appears they are who they seem to be, but my god, how hard could it be to pull the wool over my bluescreen star-struck eyes?! (Or how easy?!!)

Think about this. I haven’t seen—or certainly heard from—most of these people for a pure 20-year spell, and now suddenly I’m supposed to believe they’re back in my life, like swallows returned from Capistrano, or the shingles?

Let’s work this through logically. How hard would it be for someone to impersonate someone else on computer—someone I haven’t had contact with in all that time? They put up a tiny picture of some vague resemblance, post a reference to my hometown or school or favorite comic character, and they’re in! Some of these people look incredibly different, at least as far as I can best judge from the 4-millimeter-by-6-millimeter pictures. In some cases, it very well could be the same person’s picture, but that doesn’t mean it’s the same person. I mean I can only imagine how many photos have been taken of me when I was unaware—on the street, in the shower …

The more I’ve thought about it, my understandable suspicions have been enhanced by several 2+2 realizations. For starters, why are some of these people being so nice to me? That alone makes me suspicious. They have no reason to be, and I don’t remember some of them being all that nice before. Why this sudden change? I mean, wouldn’t it make sense that they were simply after something? (My rabbit fur hat comes to mind, but it could be anything!)

Who would do such a thing? That’s a good question and one we could contemplate at length. It’s no secret that the government has been very interested in me for years, both for my outspoken editorial writing and my singing voice. Don’t you think these people would like to put some apparati in place to keep tabs on me, to mine my mind for useful information about me and my surroundings, and obviously to impart an occasional subliminal message into my fragile skull, like Eat less foreign food!, or Stop wearing hats!

It’s ironic that we caution the kids about getting involved with Internet interlopers when we ourselves are, in all likelihood, falling victim to the same nefarious scams. I have every reason to believe there are numerous agencies at work here, faux friends, posing as people who seem to know me. It’s quite a disturbing picture, let me tell you.

During one recent contact with a person, I noticed I was asked a lot of questions—personal questions, like about how I was doing and that sort of thing. I mean, What the hell!

Along with government agencies, in all likelihood there are a spate of marketeers involved as well. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that every time we turn around we’re being sent personal advertisements on the things that “coincidentally” link with our interests—pornography, for instance. And how often am I being asked these certain particulars by people who I haven’t been in touch with for decades? (“Hey, how ya doin’? So, what kind of psychosexual fetishes are you subscribing to these days?” And that from a friend of my mother’s!)

I just want to caution everyone that whoever you think you may have rekindled some old flame with, it’s probably all a calculated sham—both on their part and, ultimately, yours. Take my advice—find yourself a book club. At least you’ll know with whom you’re dealing and why, although I'd avoid Internet book clubs if possible.

As for those many people who’ve established computer links with me by way of these various electrical group settings—I’m on to you! Don’t expect me to fall for any more of your inquisitive deception.  It’s not going to work, so find yourself another patsy in my old high school almanac.

From now on I'm only responding to pencils!

Sunday, June 17, 2012

The Odd Couple & 1984-Style Revisionist History

June 17, 2012:  I just again reread George Orwell's frightening "1984" and currently find it much less a "prophetic" vision of a dystopian future, than a brutal assessment of the world in which we already live.

Make no mistake -- it is a corrupt corporate-controlled 1984 world, and I'm not sure there's anything left to be done about it. Worse -- more significantly -- I'm not even sure that many people really care anymore anyway, and that's the most frightening aspect, to me ...

One of the remarkable operations of a 1984 world is the revising of history -- something you'll remember (or NOT remember, if you're adept at applying doublethink) from reading the book. To me, it's hysterical to see it happen so often in once instance where gas prices are concerned. One day the cost shoots up, say from $3.60 to $4.00 per gallon, and the helpless population gets pointlessly up-in-arms, and plays out its derision with flaccid expressions of benign protest ... Then, maybe two weeks go by, and prices drops from $4.00 to $3.85 per gallon! The media heralds the news: "Gas Prices Drop!" ... And the population is pleased, and pacified once again (if it ever needed to be) and the public and its' permanently damaged short-term memory rest comfortably until the next time ... Yeesh! What a species mankind is ...

But more importantly, what does this have to do with The Odd Couple? Please understand, The Odd Couple -- (which I'm too lazy to keep putting in quotes) -- is one of the most brilliant humorous shows ever on TV -- here or in Germany! The writing is absolutely fantastic, and Jack Klugman and Tony Randall are in a class by themselves with their magnificent performances of Oscar Madison and Felix Unger.

I'm proud to own the DVDs for all five seasons, which originally ran from 1969 to 1974, and even prouder to have indoctrinated my children into an intelligent appreciation of real comic genius. (We also own catalogues of "All in the Family," "The Honeymooners," and "I Love Lucy," as well as 14 seasons of "The Simpsons.")

But what is now -- and will remain -- so awfully disturbing to me -- having mainly fostered my Odd Couple appreciation through the WPIX (channel 11 in NY) reruns of the show in my formative years -- is to see the numerous sections that have been cut from the original episodes for DVD release. These, unfortunately, all seem to center around song numbers that Show Runner Garry Marshall -- I guess a cheap bastard, despite how awesome his show was, including some hysterical cameo roles he played -- did not fight to have put in the DVDs. There are perhaps a dozen song numbers that I vividly remember being sung, usually by Felix, sometimes Oscar, or from an ensemble -- that have been mercilessly butchered from these classic shows.

The worst part -- again, for me -- (this all being about me, after all) -- is that my children WILL NEVER KNOW that these moments were an important part of these brilliant episodes. Of course, I try and explain -- pointing out why there's an awkward cut (before Felix sings "Cocktails for Two," or when the cast is singing "Give My Regards To Broadway" on the subway train). Still, what a terrible shame to not enjoy those gem-like moments, some of which are actually pretty significant to the overall episode.

I'll always wonder why they couldn't leave these moments in. They played, after all, on television reruns for years and years. How petty do those songwriters and publishing companies have to have been to block their use?! What reason could they have had, really? How much money could they even expect for them?! Could Paramount not have shelled out a few extra dollars to preserve the shows in their entirety? And couldn't Marshall, who I have to assume became a zillionaire after then creating "Happy Days" AND "Laverne & Shirley," (which I hope he'll always remain embarrassed by) throw a couple thousand bucks into the pot to clear the bloody rights?! (How does one make a show as brilliant as The Odd Couple, and then -- now situated up on High -- not demand a proper preservation of that artwork?!!)

No, not today, not in 2012. As far as the world is concerned, Jaye P. Morgan was never singing "Sunshine of My Life," and Felix did not sing "Peg O' My Heart" to his plant. Nor Felix did not serenade Oscar and Blanche on their honeymoon with "I Love You Truly" while Murray played the harmonica, and Murray, Oscar and Myrna did not croon Felix to sleep singing "Dream." The boys did not break into "I Want the Sun in the Morning and the Moon at Night," nor did Felix sing the torchsong "Quarter to Three" during the poker game in the hotel, or "Look for the Silver Lining" during their monks' retreat ...

It never happened. I must have imagined it ... probably because I'm unloyal to the state because I think too much, and harbor these awful delusions that could damage the tranquility of this new Morning in America ...

Ah ... Yes ... I need to stop thinking so much ... Stop thinking so much ... Stop noticing things ... Rest ... Rest and sleep ... Sleep ... Sleep ... Zzzzzzzz ...